The Niagara Digital Campus will do all of this. And with the recent announcement that Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse have been identified as a federally recognized “Tech Hub,” it time for Niagara Falls to take part in this international corridor of technology innovation.
Urbacon could build anywhere, of course. Yet they want to build in Niagara Falls. Why? Three reasons: Climate, power and water.
Niagara Falls is in a cooler, northern climate, so it will cost less money to cool the facility than if it were, say, in Arizona or Nevada. Our very environment is leveraged to meet climate change objectives, since it minimizes use and cost associated with mechanical cooling. Moreover, the Niagara Digital Campus site has access to sufficient electrical capacity, as well as infrastructure that leads right up to the property. Indeed, NFR and Urbacon plan to build a new electrical substation, at their own expense, as part of the project. Given the developers will invest in their own electric system, capacity will not be compromised in the city.
And water? Once again, our environmental assets bring climate change solutions.
But let me explain the broader impact on our community, both in terms of revitalizing existing infrastructure and actually lowering the costs residential ratepayers will pay for electric service.
Projects like the Niagara Digital Campus run 24/7, contributing to future transmission maintenance and climate-related subsidy costs in a manner that lowers the cost paid by others. It has been widely reported that New York’s electric system is aging and in dire need of technical upgrade. There will also be infrastructure requirements associated with meeting New York’s aggressive climate objectives. New York ratepayers — all of us — will be looked upon to pay those costs. Infrastructure and Climate costs are fixed — spread among all ratepayers. Recovery of these costs will come in the form of charges that increase electric bills for all ratepayers.
Yet since the Niagara Digital Campus will pay for its own substation and transmission lines, they will take on a greater share of future system-wide maintenance and electric bill subsidies. This will decrease the contribution other ratepayers have to pay. A business like the Niagara Digital Campus offsets these costs without compromising electric capacity while stoking economic growth and the move toward decarbonization.
Finally, I would point out that it is estimated that, upon full completion, annual electricity charges are expected to exceed $78 million. Sales tax revenues from the project could run into the millions for local governments and the school district.
In the end, I want to see our climate and environmental goals fulfilled here at home—in harmony with economic opportunity, not at its detriment. Current energy policy often results in building far away from where electric demand is—and where there is a lack of infrastructure to move the energy. We need to prioritize economic development, promoting entities that leverage our environment for climate effectiveness, while bringing value to local residents who desperately need jobs and economic fulfillment. Too often, we pay lip service to bringing opportunity and lower rates to communities in need. Rarely do we have a real chance to do so.
The Niagara Digital Campus is that chance. Let’s not waste it.